texts


Andrea Zittel: A-Z Travel Units

by Anna Novakov

Artpress, February, 1996


Historically, there has always been a distinct separation between the space of the home and that of the street. In many respects, modernism focused on the divisions between the private and the public arenas, as well as the relationships between the individual and the crowd The writings of Charles Baudelaire and Walter Benjamin on the nature of urban mobility formed the basis for our late 2Oth-century concepts of this essential geographical separation.

With our collective evolution into postmodernism, the divisions between public and private seem to be continuously challenged and blurred. With urban homelessness on the rise, the street seems to have taken on many of the characteristics of an inverted interior space. Shopping carts become family station wagons, cardboard boxes act as living rooms and the sight of someone's private activities in a public space has become increasingly commonplace.

Andrea Zittel's A-Z Travel Units are moveable living spaces which can be personalized and taken on the road. For the show at the San Francisco MoMA, her three custom-made trailers were hitched to trucks and driven from San Diego by three groups of urban travelers. Each couple took different routes, all eventually driving up to the museum in which the trailers are now on view.

The travel units are dark green with interiors that include eating and sleeping areas, compact kitchens and bathrooms, as well as objects that serve as personal mementos. They are easily hitched to the back of a pickup truck which can transport them to their next destination. The ease of operation and minimal design of the living spaces encourage constant travel. Home, as a concept, is both metaphorically and physically in flux. The notion of interior space is relative to the ever-changing outdoor scenes. Thus, the construction of the interior, private space is always dependent upon the enveloping, ever-changing public space.

The individual within these living environments takes on a unique relationship to their surroundings. Home becomes a shifting symbol which is not related to place but rather to a series of interrelationships. The travelers and the homebody are melded into a single individual. Personal identity becomes an ever-present urban slippage between the public and the private.

Trailers and motor homes were once a symbol of middle-class affluence in the United States. They were the mark of a certain ease of living and mobility that signified freedom and economic stability. As family units, they provided a way for people to travel without ever leaving home. Seeing the Grand Canyon or Yosemite without having to part with your suburban dream. Within the last ten years, however, mobile homes have become an outpost for the poor who have taken on urban nomadism as a means of last resort. Escalating costs of housing have forced many to turn to movable forms of shelter as desperate ways of keeping intact the separation between public and private life.

Zittel's A-Z Travel Trailer Units are part of a legacy of artists and architects, such as Kasimir Malevich and Walter Gropius, whose projects attempt to combine functionality with aesthetic issues. While Le Corbusier's "machines for living" were based on sophisticated theories of scientific rationalism, Zittel's work comes from her own childhood memories. As she writes, "architecture and design are the arenas for experts, house trailers are the medium of enthusiasts." Her enthusiasm in the current economic situation looks more like a social activism which continuously blurs the lines between art and life.

jump to top